Apology for the Early Church Fathers
Every now and then one stumbles across a pearl among the blogosphere. A rare moment of serendipity. Such was a moment last last night. While performing a search for "Didache" I found "Apologia for the Fathers" by the blogger Seraphim.
Apologia for the Fathers makes the case that the Fathers of the early Christian Church were not early apostates, as is a popular depiction among many scripture alone Christians, but were instead recipients and faithful transmittters of Apostolic teaching and practices. In at least one case, one of the Church fathers was in actuality a disciple of Christ, the Lord God Himself.
Those seeking a concise and well written defense of the Fathers, or are open minded enough to consider the possibility that the Fathers were not apostates, should click through and read what Seraphim has written for us. Here's a taste:
So, while Ignatius of Antioch's words on the Eucharist and Christ's Real Presence in the consecrated bread and wine is a tough doctrine for many Christians, we have the testimony of a man who was a disciple of Jesus, during our Lord's walk upon the Earth, and who was martyred for his faith. We would do well to head Seraphim's words:
Source: Apologia for the Fathers
Apologia for the Fathers makes the case that the Fathers of the early Christian Church were not early apostates, as is a popular depiction among many scripture alone Christians, but were instead recipients and faithful transmittters of Apostolic teaching and practices. In at least one case, one of the Church fathers was in actuality a disciple of Christ, the Lord God Himself.
Those seeking a concise and well written defense of the Fathers, or are open minded enough to consider the possibility that the Fathers were not apostates, should click through and read what Seraphim has written for us. Here's a taste:
- ... Who, then, will presume to discredit the witness for which they paid so dearly in blood, and to contend contemptuously against their teaching? When Ignatius tells us that the Eucharist is in truth the Body and Blood of our Lord, and that this is the true apostolic teaching, can you testify against him with any authority? When Clement describes a monarchic episcopal ecclesiology in his Epistle to the Romans, how can you propound your doctrine against his without calling him either a liar or a fool, by extension maligning his teachers, who are the very Apostles who wrote the Scripture which you twist to be in harmony with your own preconceptions? ...
So, while Ignatius of Antioch's words on the Eucharist and Christ's Real Presence in the consecrated bread and wine is a tough doctrine for many Christians, we have the testimony of a man who was a disciple of Jesus, during our Lord's walk upon the Earth, and who was martyred for his faith. We would do well to head Seraphim's words:
- ... For the truly faithful, for those who truly believe in His promises, there must be a reckoning, must be a comparison of doctrine, not measuring the Fathers against one’s own standard, but measuring one’s own self against the Spirit-fortified testimony of the Church. ...
Source: Apologia for the Fathers
Labels: Apologetics, Communion, Doctrine, Early_Church
0 Comments:
<< Home